" /> 飛耳長目: January 2006 Archives

« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was signed into law on July 30th, 2002, and introduced significant legislative changes to financial practice and corporate governance regulation. It introduced strict new rules with the stated objective, “to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws.” These rules are required to be met by certain deadlines. Most public companies must meet the financial reporting and certification mandates for financial statements filed after November 15th, 2004. Smaller and foreign companies must be in compliance for any statements filed after July 15th, 2005.
The Act affects many areas of the organization including IT. One of the more difficult aspects of compliance is the need to limit access rights and privileges to the least required. Administrators have become accustomed to having privileges beyond those required for many operational tasks, and to giving end-users elevated permissions to workstations in order to address an isolated problem. Although the idea of least privilege execution has existed for years, the tools to meet this lofty goal have not been available. Windows sets access permission at the same level for each task an administrator or end-users launches. In order to achieve SOX compliance, organizations must find a way to operate within the accepted definition of least privileges, varying permissions based on the task, not the just the person.

PolicyMaker solves this problem with Application Security policy, which provides administrators a method to associate permissions and privileges with authorized tasks and applications. Using this policy, organizations can lower the permissions and privileges under which applications such as Internet Explorer and Microsoft Outlook will run when launched by an administrator. These applications don’t generally require elevated access, and can unnecessarily expose the network to attacks. Similarly, this policy allows organizations to elevate access for tasks and applications launched by restricted end-users, so that the end-user does not have to be given globally elevated permissions.

PolicyMaker provides a significant group of additional policy-based security solutions that help ensure the accuracy and reliability of corporate financial disclosures. These solutions allow organizations to solve the more difficult security problems that result from the nature of the distributed desktop environment, making it less likely that network security measures will be compromised.

Health Care (HIPAA)

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is primarily focused on the health care and insurance industries but has far-reaching impact. Its primary intent is to allow employees to move between employers and continue to have health care coverage. However, the Act provides penalties for "wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information" and requires that organizations exercise "reasonable diligence." This is the most significant impact on IT departments. Privacy information is constantly at risk of compromise and it is the responsibility of organizations to provide reasonable protections against such unauthorized disclosure. This means hardening systems against external and internal attack, as well as providing security measures that lessen the chance of accidental disclosure.

PolicyMaker provides a significant group of policy-based security solutions, including least privilege execution (as described in the Sarbanes-Oxley topic), designed to help organizations protect privacy information. These solutions allow organizations to solve the more difficult security problems that result from the nature of the distributed desktop environment.

Compliance

Compliance with regulatory mandates, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, HIPAA, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, are increasing the drive for both desktop security and standardization. However compliance with organizational mandates, including corporate standard operating procedures (SOP) and process standards such as ITIL can be equally important to IT departments. Compliance management adds a new dimension to security and standardization solutions. By definition, compliance requires that an objective standard be met. In order to satisfy this objectivity requirement, organizations must implement solutions that can be monitored and measured against the compliance standard.

Policy-based management inherently provides a framework for organizational compliance. Policy settings are discrete objects that provide a target for comparison against policy results. A comparison of policy results with objectives provides a clear measure of compliance. PolicyMaker implements full support for Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP), the standard for Group Policy planning and logging, so that organizations may measure compliance against their policy objectives.

2005 Global Security Survey

Deloitte's third annual Global Security Survey was produced with input from Chief Security Officers and security management teams from financial services industry organizations around the world. It attempts to provide broad insight around the question: How does the information security of my organization compare to that of my counterparts?

As this is the third year that we have conducted the security survey, we are now able to confidently observe differences from previous years as well as future trends. Results of this year’s survey show cause for both congratulations and concern.

Congratulations are in order for all of the respondents whose technology has been so strengthened that their organizations are far less attractive to security breaches from hackers who target their systems.

But the silver lining has a cloud: since fraudsters will always target what they perceive to be the weakest link, their efforts are now focused on the human factor. In particular, phishing and pharming (luring people to disclose sensitive information by using bogus emails and websites) are two new security threats that financial institutions faced in the past year.

This year’s survey suggests ways to thwart the fraudsters’ new focus and to further strengthen the organization.

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu(デロイト)とデロイトのメンバーファームのセキュリティ・サービスの専門家が、世界の大手金融機関等の情報技術担当幹部と面談した結果が報告されている。

調査範囲
情報セキュリティの特定の分野(投資や対応など)は十分であっても、他の分野(価値やリスクなど)には問題があるという場合もある。どの分野に問題があるかを明らかにするために、典型的な金融機関等の経営や体質の7つの側面に合わせる形で、質問項目を次の7つの項目に分類した。

1.ガバナンス
 コンプライアンス、ポリシー、説明責任、経営者のサポート、評価
2.投資
 予算管理、人員配置、マネジメント
3.価値
 経営陣の視点、アプリケーションとその利用、セキュリティ基盤、成功の測定、フィードバック、コンプライアンス
4.リスク
 業界平均、支出、意図、競争、公共ネットワーク、内部統制、暗号、ソフトウェア・ライセンス
5.セキュリティ技術の利用
 技術、ナレッジベース、傾向
6.オペレーションの品質
 ビジネス継続管理、ベンチマーキング、管理、検知、事故対応、特権ユーザー、認証、内部統制
7.プライバシー
 コンプライアンス、倫理、データ収集方針、コミュニケーション手段、保護手段、個人情報保護

欧州ネットワーク情報セキュリティ委員会

ENISA:European Network and Information Security Agency
 EU機関と各加盟国における公益事業、金融、テレコム等のITインフラのセキュリティとリスクマネジメントをサポートすることを目的に2004年3月に創設された。ENISAの具体的なビジネスモデルは、未だ発表されていないものの、加盟国の行政機関や民間企業と連携しながら、EUと加盟国にアドバイスをすること、そしてIT分野におけるセキュリティ確保とリスクマネジメントのベストプラクティスを普及させることが主要業務とされている。国際的なサイバー犯罪への対応を専門とするEU機関が今まで存在しなかったこともあり、官民ともにENISAの今後の活躍を期待している。

ドイツの情報セキュリティ政策

 軍事・外交を除くと、行政・立法・司法に関する多くの権限が連邦州政府に移管されている。また、連邦政府の権限の一部は欧州連合レベルでの調整を必要としている。情報セキュリティ分野においては、軍事・外交・経済面でのグローバルな対応が必要なことから連邦政府が権限をもっている。しかし、その場合にも分権志向の連邦制度の与える影響を考慮する必要がある。

 情報セキュリティ分野では欧州連合がより大きな影響力を持つようになっている。2004年3月に欧州ネットワーク情報セキュリティ委員会(ENISA)が創設され、欧州連合レベルでの動きが活発になっている。

 ドイツ連邦政府では、内務省(BMI)が電子政府を含む情報政策全般を担当しており、その中のCIO室がITの戦略・政策・セキュリティを統括している。政府のITインフラの構築・運用については、CIO指揮下でKBStが担当している。情報セキュリティ施策は、BMIの一組織であるBSI(連邦情報セキュリティ局)が中心となって担当している。

欧州におけるIT政策

 欧州のIT政策の基本目標は、欧州連合の企業・政府・市民が、世界的な知識情報立脚型経済の形成に中心的役割で参画できる環境を作り上げることにある。これは、2000年3月にリスボンで開催された欧州連合サミットにおいて、欧州連合の社会経済政策の第一目標として掲げられ、同時に、2010年までに世界最大の知識立脚型経済の実現を目指した総合戦略(通称「リスボン戦略」)の一環として、より明確な位置付けが行われた。2004年11月に発表された中間評価報告書では、現状はその目標達成には程遠いという厳しい評価が下されている。

 欧州連合のIT政策の最大の特徴は、それが情報社会政策と呼ばれるように、情報技術を通じた幅広い経済社会の変革を目指すことにある。これは技術としてのITの影響力が広範かつ深甚であることにもよるが、欧州連合の場合は、域内統合を基礎としたEUの理念そのものとも関係している。また、域内統合政策との関係は、現在の欧州委員会における情報社会政策の実施体制にも反映されている。

1.欧州連合のIT政策の概要
 バローゾ委員長率いる新体制が発足したが、情報社会政策が大きく変わったとは言い難い。情報社会を担当するレディング委員は、メディアも担当していることから、今後ビジネスの他にコンテンツ関係や社会文化的なサービス分野への配慮が大きくなる可能性がある。

 法制面では、2003年10月が国内法への移行期限であったテレコム・パッケージについて、2004年12月時点で依然として5か国が移行を終えていない。施策面では、インターネットの安全のための組織、欧州ネットワーク情報安全エージェンシー(ENISA)が2004年3月に設置されたほか、「より安全なインターネット計画」の第2期計画(2005〜2008年)が、4500万ユーロの予算を付して、2004年12月に認められた。

2.eEurope計画の進捗状況
 欧州委員会は2004年2月に、eEurope2005行動計画の中間総括を発表した。中間総括は、同行動計画はeEuropeの目的及び新規加盟国における情報社会への挑戦という2つの観点からは適切なものであったとしながらも、進捗状況についての評価は行っておらず、実施方法と活動自身に関する修正を準備するものとなっている。この中間総括を受けて、欧州委員会は2004年5月に、eEurope2005行動計画の更新を発表した。更新計画における重要テーマは、以前のものと実質的には変わっていない。

3.技術開発政策
 欧州連合の産業技術研究開発政策の中心をなすフレームワーク計画について、現行の第6次計画(2003〜2006年)の後継となる第7次計画(2007年〜)に向けた準備作業が本格化した。欧州委員会は2004年6月に、将来の欧州連合の研究支援政策のガイドライン「科学と技術、欧州の未来の鍵」を発表すると同時に、第7次計画の優先テーマの採択に関して意見を募るための手続きを開始した。欧州委員会は2005年初めにも第7次計画の骨格を提案する予定である。

[出典] 欧州におけるIT活用に関する調査研究報告書(JEITAパリ駐在員2004報告、2005年3月)

Compliance WHITE PAPER

Notable New Issues

ComplianceINSIGHT: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
This in-depth white paper provides a solid definition of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), some of the surrounding interpretations of HIPAA's key sections, and how to deal with what an IT staff needs to understand, do, and document in order to bring internal controls in line with HIPAA security requirements. It also provides insight into specific tools and technologies available to simplify compliance initiatives.
Offered By: ITCi

ComplianceINSIGHT: Sarbanes-Oxley
From regulatory requirements to IT impacts and technology solutions

ComplianceINSIGHT: Sarbanes-Oxley takes an in-depth look at the SOX sections which hold the most impact for IT departments, including 403, 404, 802, and 1102. This paper evaluates SOX's original intent, its IT implications, and 10 steps necessary to sustain SOX-compliance benefits. Insight into specific compliance tools, and a sample top-down compliance plan are also given.
Offered By: ITCi

Top 10 Reasons Why ITIL Implementations Fail
Learn how to make your ITIL implementation successful with a complimentary white paper from BMC Software. Gain valuable advice about solving common ITIL challenges and learn how to deliver reliable IT services that support business goals. Leading ITIL expert Malcolm Fry tells you how.
Offered By: ITCi

Sponsored White Papers

After Year One - Systematizing IT Controls for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
Offered By: MKS
An Enterprise Approach to Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
Offered By: Business Objects
An Innovative Approach to Managing Software Requirements
Offered By: MKS
BusinessObjects XI - Redefining How Information Empowers Users
Offered By: Business Objects
BusinessObjects XI Built for Operational BI
Offered By: Business Objects
Creating Business Value Through Compliance-Oriented Back Up, Recovery, and Archive
Offered By: Quantum Corporation
Darning SOX: Technology and Corporate Governance Elements of Sarbanes-Oxley
Offered By: Tripwire
Data Mobility Group's Dianne McAdam's Backup and Archive Storage Choices paper
Offered By: Quantum Corporation
Enabling Effective Change Control
Offered By: Solidcore Systems
Enterprise Compliance Solutions for the Payment Card Industry
Offered By: VeriSign
Finding the Compliance "Sweet Spot": Demonstrating Compliance, Reducing Complexity, and Lowering Costs
Offered By: Symantec
HIPAA Security Provisions: Is Your Network Ready for a Physical?
Offered By: Tripwire
Integrated FISMA Compliance and Security Management
Offered By: Scalable Software, Inc.
Meeting the PCI Data Security Standard
Offered By: Solidcore Systems
Reducing the Cost of IT Compliance: Streamlining the IT Compliance Life Cycle
Offered By: Scalable Software, Inc.
Regulatory Compliance: How to Guard Critical Information on Windows Active Directory and Third-Party Applications
Offered By: Symantec
Sarbanes-Oxley, IT Governance and Enterprise Change Management
Offered By: MKS
Sustainable Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
Offered By: Solidcore Systems
The PCI Data Standard: It's Everywhere You Want Your Credit Data to Be
Offered By: Tripwire
Tiered Storage: Optimizing Storage for Different Technology, Different Needs
Offered By: Quantum Corporation
Using Security Compliance Software to Improve Business Efficiency and Reduce Costs
Offered By: Symantec
VeriSignAR Compliance Solutions Brochure
Offered By: VeriSign
VeriSignAR Compliance Solutions Data Sheet
Offered By: VeriSign

POLICY AND LEGISLATION

Policy and Standards
A factsheet that explains the policies and standards related to information security, including associated terminology and advice on implementation.
Download PDF(109 Kb)

Legislation
Introduces some of the legislation relating to information security.
Download PDF
(124 Kb)

RESOURCES
::IT Compliance Institute

Information Security, DTI

The Information Security market was worth £865 million in the UK in 2002. The UK industry is widely recognised to be highly innovative and has led the way in the development of standards and good practices, notably with the BS7799 standard. However, it has generally failed to build successful mass-market suppliers in a market that is dominated by overseas companies, particularly from the US. In practice the market is fragmented on both the supplier and the user side. Many companies have no single point of responsibility for their information security, and purchasing is often split across several departments. One of the reasons for this is that security is often viewed as a bag of technologies by both buyer and seller, rather than a coherent framework built around robust policies and procedures.

The prime responsibility of the DTI's Information Security Policy Team is to help UK businesses address this issue, and manage their information security more effectively. We work with business to:

・identify the barriers to the adoption of new technologies
・raise awareness of the importance of effective information security management
・develop guidance on good practice in information security. This includes the development of 'ISO/IEC 17799/BS 7799: A Code of Practice for Information Security Management'
・develop solutions to emerging problems. This has included the new arrangements for Trusted Third Parties that provide cryptographic services
・promote the development of appropriate international standards and a regulatory framework that encourages the uptake of electronic commerce

The Electronic Signatures Regulations 2002
The Electronic Communications Act 2000
BSI: Certification for BS-7799 and ISO-27001
BS 7799 Information Security Management

Compliance, Information Assurance Governance Framework

Introduction

In the context of the framework, ‘compliance’ is taken to be a measurement of the degree to which security practice in an organisation accords with the documented security requirements and standards.

This definition encompasses the idea that an organisation could be partially compliant, and also the concept that compliance must be against something - an agreed set of procedures or a defined target state of affairs.

Principles of Governance

Cabinet Office requires UK Government departments to have developed an ISMS demonstrating compliance with ISO/IEC 17799 for all their nominated key information systems.

ISO/IEC 17799 identifies two kinds of compliance:

  • compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and
  • physical, personnel, procedural and technical compliance, primarily against the stated security policy.

In practice the applicable legal and regulatory requirements will normally be documented within the security policy; consequently the target for compliance is the agreed security policy. However, this section of the framework is nevertheless based on the ISO/IEC 17799 division.

Policy Compliance

The achievement of accreditation for a system, and/or ISO/IEC 17799 certification for an organisation, are indications of compliance against the system RMADS and organisation’s ISMS respectively. However, as noted in the introduction to this section, compliance is a matter of degree.

Maintaining accredited status therefore relies very firmly on the process of ongoing risk management, in order to monitor the gap between policy and practice, with an aim of reducing it to zero and maintaining it at that level.

Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Overview
ISO/IEC 17799 states that:
‘The design, operation, use and management of information systems should comply with all relevant criminal, civil, statutory, regulatory or contractual obligations’

The contractual aspect will depend on individual circumstances and the framework does not address it.

Organisations also need to ensure that changes in legislation and regulations are taken into account for both new and legacy systems. On an ongoing basis, the impact of new or revised legislation and regulations should be identified, together with the action necessary for compliance, and the associated timescales. The Cabinet Office Better Regulation Executive (BRE) can assist in this.

Data Protection Act
The Data Protection Act 1998 [External website] deals with personal data, and sets out eight key principles in relation to the processing, storage and dissemination of the data. The Act sets out a subject’s right of access, and provides for certain exemptions. Further advice can be obtained from the Office of the Information Commissioner.

Freedom of Information Act
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 [External website] obliges government bodies including Central Government and Local Authorities to provide access to ‘recorded data’ following a valid request. The Act provides for certain exemptions. Advice can be obtained from the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) and the Cabinet Office Security Policy Division (COSPD).

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 [External website] sets out the conditions under which communications can be intercepted by government organisations, in a way which is aligned with the Human Rights Act. Advice can be obtained from the Home Office.

Official Secrets Act
The Official Secrets Act 1989 [External website] makes it an offence for a servant of the Crown or a Government contractor to commit unauthorised disclosure of sensitive information passed to them, including in situations where the act was not deliberate but occurred through the failure to apply such care as might reasonably be expected.

Computer Misuse Act
The Computer Misuse Act 1990 [External website], inter alia, criminalises the act of attempting to gain unauthorised access to a computer system including where these are assets provided by an employer.

Copyright Designs and Patents Act
The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 [External website] applies to computer software products, and is intended to prevent the unauthorised copying of same. Organisations must therefore monitor their position on software licence agreements in terms of licences deployed and assigned, in order to ensure that software licence agreements are not breached.

Police and Criminal Evidence Act
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 includes a specific clause setting out the conditions under which computer generated evidence is admissible in court.

It should be noted that compliance with BS7799 does not give legal nor regulatory exemption. Organisations should always seek legal advice where there is doubt. The Treasury Solicitors are a useful first point of contact.

Regulatory compliance
Regulatory requirements are usually industry-specific. However, the 2001 Basel II Accord from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision indicates the likely scope of requirements in most cases.

Basel II is concerned with ensuring a sufficient level of financial provision against risks, and sets out a means of calculating the necessary level of provision. Crucially, the method includes a consideration of operational risk i.e. the effectiveness of Information Assurance processes and controls within the organisation. For most analysts this embodies the principle that reduced risk leads to a reduced requirement for capital. From an IA point of view it reinforces the statement that IA is an integral part of underlying business operations.

Determining Applicable Legislation
Outline advice on determining applicable legislation is available from the e-Government Security Framework documents, and from IS2.

The recommended best practice is to seek specialist advice in deciding the applicable legislation. This framework identifies candidates for consideration in relation to an organisation’s Information Systems.

The Turnbull Report

IT Governance is a prime requirement to ensure compliance with the raft of new legislation that is starting to appear in the wake of well-publicised financial mismanagement of high profile companies. Prime …..is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This Act not only changes the financial reporting requirements of organisations covered by the Act, it effectively shifts the balance of power within those organisations; creating a whole new corporate culture and hierarchy.’

As a piece of US legislation, Sarbanes-Oxley does not specifically apply in the UK (although UK companies listed in the US must comply, and UK based auditors of US companies are not completely exempt).

The Turnbull report [External website], while it relates to UK listed companies, nevertheless provides strong recommendations. It sets out a number of key issues relating to the requirement for an internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting.

Internal Audit

Organisations should consider adopting the security review model developed by the MoD, which is based on validation, verification and oversight.

Validation is the process of confirming that the implemented controls are appropriate to the risk. Verification confirms that the planned controls have actually been implemented. Oversight confirms that for the organisation as a whole, the security position is acceptable.

In general terms these three processes come down to:

  • An ongoing review of implemented countermeasures against an ongoing review of threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Continual monitoring of the implementation status of defined countermeasures.
  • An independent review process at the organisational level.

External Audit

The Official Cabinet Committee on Security is required to present annually to the Prime Minister an audit on the information security of the public sector. CSIA is required to produce a report indicating the status of IA in government departments for the Prime Minister and Senior Officials, in line with the Government Strategy for Information Assurance and in line with Sir Andrew Turnbull’s statement that such a survey should be conducted on a annual basis.

Departments completed an information assurance audit of their key IS systems in 2004, which was based on the IA metrics issued by CSIA. The return gives a snapshot picture of the health of a department’s IA process, and enables changes over time to be measured and assessed for action. Audit of evidence supporting the IA metrics is under consideration by CSIA.

To assist in this process, departmental SIROs are required to undertake an annual assessment of IA in their departments and submit a statement of this to CSIA for key IS. Each department must define its critical IA objectives and provide evidence of compliance to a set of criteria based on ISO/IEC 17799 controls.

ThruVision Ltd

– Launching a New Era in Security Screening (2004 Competition Winner)

Hidden guns, explosives and contraband will be easier to detect thanks to revolutionary radiation-free imaging technology developed by ThruVision Ltd. Winners of the £25,000 top prize in the 2004 Research Councils Business Plan Competition, the company is due to start rolling out a range of security screening products at the end of 2005.

A spin-out company from the CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire, ThruVision aims to become the leading commercial provider of compact security screening equipment using terahertz imaging technology. This technology works by detecting the terahertz waves that all people and objects emit. Because no X-rays or other types of ionising radiation are used, health and safety is not a concern.

Link

イギリスの情報セキュリティ政策

中央政府の各省庁が個別に研究開発資金を提供している。民間の重要なインフラのセキュリティ対策は「国立インフラストラクチャ・セキュリティ調整センタ(NISCC)」が担っている。一方、大学などの学術研究機関への研究助成は「工学・物理・科学研究評議会(EPSRC)」が行っている。

NISCC
1999年に設立され、広く国家安全保障に関係する省庁からの出向者85名(2004年60名)で構成されている。内務省、セキュリティサービス(MI5)、貿易産業省、警察、国防省が関係している。NISCCの2003/2004年度予算は515万ポンド(約10億円)で、2005/2006年度は1000万ポンド(約20億円)となっている。予算額はセキュリティレベルに応じて決定されている。セキュリテュレベルの評価は内務省が行っている。⇒What is the Critical National Infrastructure?

EPSRC

貿易産業省の監督下にあり、年間の研究開発費総額は5億ポンド(約1000億円)である。犯罪防止研究分野では、画像処理・顔面認識技術(25%)、暗号化技術(24%)、コンピュータ・ネットワーク・セキュリティ技術(12%)、法科学(Forensic Analysis)とDNA鑑定技術(9%)、犯罪捜査管理技術(8%)、製品セキュリティ(6%)、取引時のセキュリティ(6%)、電子透かし(5%)、生体認証(3%)、検査装置(2%)が研究されている。また犯罪捜査に関する技術開発では「Think Crime」というプログラムがあり、2000万ポンド(約40億円)を投入している。この中で重要視されているのが暗号化技術とネットワークセキュリティである。

政策と調整

内閣府(Cabinet Office)・首相戦略ユニット(Prime Minister's Strategy Unit)
同・中央情報保証局(CSIS: Central Sponsor for Information Assurance)
Information Assurance Governance Framework [PDF 1.5MB, 44 Pages]

Compliance
UK government departments are required to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 17799 for all their nominated key information systems, in terms of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and in terms of compliance with stated and agreed business security policy.

[参考資料]
Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention
Executive Summary
Technology Forward Look :( User guide)
Technology Forward Look: Technical version
Gaining Insight from Three Different Futures
Project pack
Cyber Trust & Crime Prevention: Foresight Overview  - A report prepared by RAND Europe for Foresight, identifying existent work on related areas

Science Reviews :
Synthesis of the Science Reviews -Brian Collins and Robin Mansell
Confidence and Risk on the Internet - William H. Dutton and Adrian Shepherd
Dependable Pervasive Systems - Cliff Jones and Brian Randall
Identities and Authentication - Fred Piper, Matt J.B. Robshaw and Scarlet Schwiderski-Grosche
Knowledge Technologies and the Semantic Web - Kieron O’Hara and Nigel Shadbolt
Perceptions of Risk in Cyberspace - Jonathan Jackson, Nick Allum and George Gaskell
Risk Management in Cyberspace - James Backhouse with Ayse Bener, Narisa Chauvidul, Frederick Wamala and Robert Willison
The Economics of Trust Between Cyber Partners - Jonathan Cave
The Future of Privacy Protection - Charles D. Raab
Trust in Agent-based Software -Sarvapali D. Ramchurn and Nicholas R. Jennings
Usability and Trust in Information Systems - M. Angela Sasse

Short Review & Discussion Papers
The ethics of cyber trust - Kieron O'Hara Cyber trust and crime prevention: towards generally accepted digital principles - John Edwards
Privacy, Identity and Crime Prevention - Michelle Rogerson and Ken Pease
The See-through Society: Openness and the future of the Internet - Paul Miller
Cyberspace markets, social capital and trust - W. Edward Steinmueller

Human Genome Project

Begun formally in 1990, the U.S. Human Genome Project was a 13-year effort coordinated by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health. The project originally was planned to last 15 years, but rapid technological advances accelerated the completion date to 2003. Project goals were to

  • identify all the approximately 20,000-25,000 genes in human DNA,
  • determine the sequences of the 3 billion chemical base pairs that make up human DNA,
  • store this information in databases,
  • improve tools for data analysis,
  • transfer related technologies to the private sector, and
  • address the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) that may arise from the project.

To help achieve these goals, researchers also studied the genetic makeup of several nonhuman organisms. These include the common human gut bacterium Escherichia coli, the fruit fly, and the laboratory mouse.

A unique aspect of the U.S. Human Genome Project is that it was the first large scientific undertaking to address potential ELSI implications arising from project data.

Another important feature of the project was the federal government's long-standing dedication to the transfer of technology to the private sector. By licensing technologies to private companies and awarding grants for innovative research, the project catalyzed the multibillion-dollar U.S. biotechnology industry and fostered the development of new medical applications.

Sequence and analysis of the human genome working draft was published in February 2001 and April 2003 issues of Nature and Science. See an index of these papers and learn more about the insights gained from them.

For more background information on the U.S. Human Genome Project, see the following

CSOs seek regulatory sanity in 2006

By Bill Brenner, Senior News Writer
26 Dec 2005 | SearchSecurity.com   LINK

CSOがもっとも苦労しているのが法令遵守への対応である。
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX)
Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

これらの法律に対応すると同時に業界の自主規制、たとえば Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard にも対応していかねばならない。 2005 年は ChoicePoint Inc., Lexis-Nexis Group and CardSystems Inc. にとって受難の年であった。この傾向は2006年も続き、California's Security Breach Information Act (SB-1386)をはじめとした州法にも対応していかなければいけない。現在39の州が類似の法整備に着手している。

White Papers
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Business Blessing in Disguise
Case Study: Managing Powerful Users Helps C&D Technologies Meet Sarbanes Oxley Requirements (The PowerTech Group)
Successful Compliance Strategies -- a SearchCIO.com Research Guide (SearchCIO.com, Sponsored by Symantec)
Achieving Regulatory Compliance for IT Change and Configuration Control (BMC Software, Inc)
Achieving Regulatory Compliance for Identity Management Control (BMC Software, Inc)

Top trends for 2006!

Are you wondering what to watch out for in 2006? Worried about when the next big scare is going to hit? SearchSecurity.com is the perfect place to stay up to date in 2006. From the editors of Information Security magazine and SearchSecurity.com, compiled below are recent news stories designed to give you a 'sneak peak' of what's to come.

Spyware, application attacks to be biggest 2006 threats
Security experts say virus writers will turn their attention to spyware in the year ahead, victimizing many still-unsuspecting users. Application-specific attacks, phishing and data exposures will also plague security pros.

CSOs seek regulatory sanity in 2006
IT security officers long for a common system to comply with laws that are similar, but often have conflicting demands. Some say a single set of federal guidelines could help, but others fear the implications.

End of spam, phishing threats not far off
Viruses, spam and phishing aren't going away overnight. But for 2006, one research firm says a new set of messaging security threats will take center stage.

米国国土安全保障省

同時多発テロを受け、米国を防御し、国民の自由を守るため国土安全保障省(Department of Homeland Security、以下DHS)が2003年に設立されている。日本ではテロ対策よりも地震災害を想定して、ITに依存するライフライン(重要インフラ)のセキュリティ対策への関心が高まってきている。ここでは重要インフラへの脅威とそこからの防護について紹介する。

米国の重要インフラは、農業、食品、水、運輸、金融、化学、エネルギー、公衆衛生、ITなどのセクターで、公共機関や民間企業、それも85%以上は民間による運営だ。そのため、DHSなどが脅威やそこからの防護に関する様々な情報を提供し、また官民協力を進めることで、政府が防護しやすい状況を作り出すことが求められている。


重要インフラの防護対策

DHS Daily Open Source Infrastructure Report

インフラ防護の関係者啓蒙・教育を目的にDHSが発行するレポート。セクター別に様々なメディアの報道を集め、情報提供体制を強化した。

2005年11月16日付けのレポートでは、英国の検疫所で鳥インフルエンザにより50羽以上のフィンチ(小鳥の種類)が死んだ事件を報告している。また、エネルギーセクターについて、グリッドオペレーター(送配電ネットワークの管理者(社))が暖房でエネルギー消費量が増える冬を前に、天然ガスなど資源を確保しないと、停電が発生する可能性があると警告したことなど。AP通信、証券取引委員会、NY Timesなどのメディアからの関連ニュースをまとめている。

Protected Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program

民間の事業主がインフラについての情報を連邦政府に自発的に提出することで、テロリストの攻撃による脆弱性の緩和を目指す。2002年2月に発足。民間企業がDHSなど政府に提供する情報が不十分だという指摘があったため、PCIIを設けることで情報の安全性の確保を図り、かつ政府へ情報が伝わるようにしたものだ。

PCIIだと確認された情報は開示を拒否することができる*1。一方、PCIIで情報を集めることにより、DHSは
・ 重要インフラの分析と安全確保、システム防護
・ 脆弱性の明確化とリスクアセスメント
・ 回復準備対策の促進
を行う。


重要インフラとサイバーセキュリティ


重要インフラの運営は、コンピュータやネットワークを用いて行っている。そして、システムはコンピュータ、サーバ、ルータ、光ファイバーのケーブルなどで相互接続されていて、IT技術に大きく依存している。

サイバースペースの健全な機能は国家の経済およびセキュリティに不可欠だ。重要インフラの中枢と認識されている。以前は、商務省内の重要インフラ保証局(Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office:CIAO)が担当していたが、DHS創設を受け、情報分析・インフラ防護局(Directorate for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection)が生まれた。サイバー関連についてはNational Cyber Security Divisionなどが対応している。

特に2001年の同時多発テロ以後、アルカイダなどのテロリストのグループが、電気をはじめとする重要インフラにサイバーテロを仕掛ける準備をしているとして、米国では警戒感が強まってきた。アフガニスタンでFBIがテロ計画について情報を得たという報告もある。このような背景から、米政府はサイバーセキュリティ国家戦略を作成して、強化に努めている。


National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace(サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略)

2002年7月に発表された政策声明書。国家安全保障に関する国家戦略(National Strategy for Homeland Security)は、米国内でのテロ攻撃の防止、テロに対する脆弱性の改善、攻撃発生時のダメージ最小化の3つの目的を持つ。サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略は、これらの目的を達成するために作成された。

サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略は、法律で遵守を義務付けるものではない。自発的対応を求めながら、国家として個人や企業に勧めるサイバーセキュリティ対策を明確にした。

サイバー攻撃は迅速に行われるものであり、それも攻撃者の身元特定が難しい。テロリストや犯罪者、米国に敵対する国家が利用すると、被害は極めて大きいものとなる可能性がある。従って、サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略により、米国の国家における脆弱性を改善し、重要な情報インフラやそれを支える物理的資産への攻撃を弱める。そして、国家としての方向性を明確にする。

戦略的目的
サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略の戦略的目的は
・ 米国の重要インフラへのサイバー攻撃を防ぐ
・ サイバー攻撃への国家の脆弱性の改善
・ 万一、サイバー攻撃が起こった場合。損害と回復にかかる時間を最小限にする
の3つだ。

DHSでは、進化を続けるサイバー脅威の対応に、最も体勢が整っているのは民間企業だが、連邦政府の対応が必要なこともあるという姿勢を取っている。そのため、官民の協力が鍵と考える。米国の重要インフラで民間が所有する部分の安全を守るため、政府は調査や技術開発のサポートを行う。

また、戦略では、サイバースペースの安全確保のための重要なプライオリティを次のように定めた。

1.National Cyberspace Security Response System
サイバースペースのセキュリティ・対応のためのシステム。サイバー攻撃などサイバースペースの安全を脅かす事態を、すばやく確認、情報を交換し、問題解決に努めることで、損害を緩和できることが多々ある。一方、プライバシーや市民の権利である、自由を守ることも重要だとの認識の下、対応する。

2. National Cyberspace Threat and Vulnerability Reduction Program
脅威や脆弱性を緩和するためのプログラム。サイバースペースの脆弱性を利用した系統的な攻撃は、国家の重要インフラを危険にさらす。a)サイバー攻撃を防ぎ、当局の起訴能力を促進 b)脆弱性検査の過程を作成することで、脅威や脆弱性でどのような結果が起きうるか、さらに理解を深める

3. National Cyberspace Security Awareness and Training Program
セキュリティ認識と訓練のためのプログラム。サイバーセキュリティの脆弱性は、一般ユーザーやさらにはシステム管理者、開発者、企業の責任者であるCEO、また情報管理の責任者CIOなどが、サイバーセキュリティへの認識を十分に持たないために生じるものが多い。そのため、一般市民などを対象にした総括的な認識プログラムの促進をはじめ、様々なトレーニングおよび教育プログラムを行う。

4. Securing Governments Cyberspace
政府サイバースペースの防護。重要インフラで政府が直接、運営するものは一部だが、様々なセクターにおいて政府が関係している。政府がサイバーセキュリティを強化して、模範を示すことが必要だ。そのため、ワイヤレスローカルネットワークの防護や外注(アウトソーシング)におけるセキュリティの改善などを行っている。

5. National Security and International Cyberspace Security Cooperation
サイバーセキュリティの安全のための国際協力。サイバースペースは全世界とつながっていて、サイバー攻撃は世界のどこからでも行うことができる。そのため、国際社会の協力が必要だ。サイバー関連スパイ防止活動、攻撃への対応を改善、米国内でのサイバー攻撃への対応についての国際社会への協力要請および調整体制の改善など。


National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets

国家安全保障に関する国家戦略(National Strategy for Homeland Security)を実践するため、National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace(サイバーセキュリティ国家戦略)を補足するもので、2003年2月に発表された。主要資産とは、原子力発電所、ダム、政府施設などを指す。

National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assetsでは、国家の目標を明確にして、国家の安全、ガバナンス、公衆衛生、経済などに必要不可欠な、インフラや資産を守るための指針をさらに詳しくまとめた。また、州政府や自治体、民間企業、国民がそれぞれ、重要インフラや主要資産のセキュリティを促進するために取ることのできる措置についても触れている。

例えば、連邦政府として国土安全保障省は、セクターの壁を越えて、州政府や自治体、民間企業などが協力するためのまとめ役、すなわちファシリテーター的な役割を果たす。自治体は、重要インフラの防護のための計画や準備の促進を行い、さらに脅威が自治体の手にあまるような場合は、重要インフラに関係する民間企業などが連邦政府の援助を求めるための「パイプ」となる。さらに米国の重要インフラの大部分を所有、運営するのは民間企業であるため、脅威の前線で、リスクに対処する計画、保証、投資を調べ、企業に修正、改善を求める。

また、戦略作成のためには、まず「敵」であるテロリストなど、攻撃を仕掛ける側の動機、利用したがる攻撃方法や攻撃対象を知る必要がある。攻撃についての分析を行った上で、分析結果を念頭に入れて、インフラや資産のセキュリティを調べる。

さらに短期的な指針として、防護が必要なものに優先順位をつけるなどの計画、およびリソースの配分、データベースの開発、セキュリティ担当者のモデルトレーニングプログラムの作成などを定めた。

このように重要インフラの防護では、サイバースペースの防護に大きな努力を払っている。そのため、物理的な攻撃への対策と比較して、サイバー上の問題のほうが重視されている傾向がある。2005年7月にCongressional Research Serviceが発表したレポート、『Critical Infrastructures: Background, Policy and Implementation』でも、今後、いかにしてサイバーセキュリティと物理的なセキュリティをまとめていくかが課題だと述べている。

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*1 アメリカでは、1966年に制定されたFreedom of Information Act という情報の公開に関する法律があり、公的機関が収集した情報について、国民から開示要求があった場合、これに応じなければならないと定めている。PCIIの施行以前は、重要インフラ事業者が提供した情報も、この法律によって要求があれば公開義務が生じる為、事業者が情報を提供するにあたっての非積極性を招いていた。

ITU Cybersecurity news

ITU SPU Newslog
★ News from the ITU SPU Newslog related to Cybersecurity

Cyber Security in an Era of Technological Change

By: Marten van Heuven, Maarten Botterman, Stephan De Spiegeleire

This report reflects the findings of a conference on cyber security and cyber crime on 9 April 2002 in The Hague, The Netherlands. It looks into the urgency for a better common understanding and better cooperation on these issues, in the light of the growth of the Internet, both in terms of number of users and in terms of social, cultural and economic impact. Focus was at three themes regarding the role of the public and the private sector in dealing with cyber security and cyber crime: What are the threats and what is the matrix of possible responses? How should Europe and the United States cooperate? How should the public and the private sector work together? The threat to information infrastructures is real. Threats run the gamut of possibilities, from faulty software to groups or hostile states intending to inflict damage. There is no agreement on whether the threat is waning. Overcoming the childhood diseases of current technology may abate the threat. On the other hand, more complicated technology may create greater vulnerabilities. Awareness of the threat varies. It gets ample and concerned attention from cyber security experts in industry and government. However, CEOs and top government officials, perhaps complacent after the Y2K experience, do not count cyber security among their top five concerns, yet. But, even as opinions vary as to whether future threats will be less or worse, many experts expect a high impact event somewhere in the (near) future. Comparison has been made to the oil disaster with the Exxon Valdez: a disaster like this is likely to happen. This will bring the risk high onto the agenda of decisionmakers and politicians. For mitigation of the risk, as a general rule, market-driven approaches have much to recommend themselves. Practical steps in this have already been identified. But there is also a clear role for government. Last but not least: the threat cannot be dealt with by one country (or trade block) alone. The report expands on this.

Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available. Full Document ( 1.7 MB) Summary Only (0.5 MB)

DHS Research&Technology

Information & Infrastructure

The Department's research and technology focus will seek to develop capabilities to detect and deter attacks on our information systems and critical infrastructures.  The S&T Directorate will develop a national research and development enterprise to support homeland defense.  This research and development effort will be driven by a constant examination of the nation's vulnerabilities, repeated testing of our security systems, and a thorough evaluation of the threats and weaknesses in the system.

Internet Security

DHS will promote research and development of software and technology that will protect information systems and databases.

Current best practices for protection are available through the following web sites:

Telecommunications

DHS will support the telecommunications critical infrastructure by promoting research and development of tools and technology to prevent disruption or compromise of these services.  

For additional information on the telecommunications sector refer to the following web site:

Security Systems

One important DHS priority will be to examine the vulnerabilities found in security systems. The emphasis will be on catastrophic terrorism - threats to the security of our homeland that could result in large-scale loss of life as well as triggering major economic repercussions. The focus will be on both evolutionary improvements to current capabilities as well as the development of revolutionary new capabilities.

Additional Information:

Combat Cyber Threats

Ridge Creates New Division to Combat Cyber Threats
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
June 6, 2003

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in implementing the President's National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace and the Homeland Security Act of 2002, has created the National Cyber Security Division (NCSD) under the Department's Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate. The NCSD will provide for 24 x 7 functions, including conducting cyberspace analysis, issuing alerts and warning, improving information sharing, responding to major incidents, and aiding in national-level recovery efforts. This Division represents a significant step toward advancing the Federal government's interaction and partnership with industry and other organizations in this critical area.

"Cyber security cuts across all aspects of critical infrastructure protection. Most businesses in this country are unable to segregate the cyber operations from the physical aspects of their business because they operate interdependently," said Secretary Ridge. "This new division will be focused on the vitally important task of protecting the nation's cyber assets so that we may best protect the nation’s critical infrastructure assets."

About the National Cyber Security Division (NCSD)

The NCSD will identify, analyze and reduce cyber threats and vulnerabilities; disseminate threat warning information; coordinate incident response; and provide technical assistance in continuity of operations and recovery planning.

The NCSD builds upon the existing capabilities transferred to DHS from the former Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office, the National Infrastructure Protection Center, the Federal Computer Incident Response Center, and the National Communications System. The creation of the NCSD both strengthens government-wide processes for response and improves protection of critical cyber assets through maximizing and leveraging the resources of these previously separate offices. Robert Liscouski, the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection, will oversee NCSD.

With 60 employees, the Division is organized around three units designed to:

Identify risks and help reduce the vulnerabilities to government's cyber assets and coordinate with the private sector to identify and help protect America's critical cyber assets;
Oversee a consolidated Cyber Security Tracking, Analysis, & Response Center (CSTARC), which will detect and respond to Internet events; track potential threats and vulnerabilities to cyberspace; and coordinate cyber security and incident response with federal, state, local, private sector and international partners; and
Create, in coordination with other appropriate agencies, cyber security awareness and education programs and partnerships with consumers, businesses, governments, academia, and international communities.

Consistent with law and policy, DHS's NCSD will coordinate closely with the Office of Management and Budget and National Institute of Standards and Technology regarding the security of Federal systems and coordinate with Federal law enforcement authorities, as appropriate. NCSD will leverage other DHS components including the Science and Technology Directorate, the U.S. Secret Service and the Department's Privacy Officer.

The NCSD will work closely with the DHS Science & Technology (S&T) Directorate to implement all required programs for research and development in cyber security. While S&T will provide the actual research and development functions and execution, the NCSD will provide detailed requirements into the direction of this R&D in response to needs of our public and private sectors partners.

Energy

North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)

Regional Differences Affect the Price and Demand for Energy — Nov. 23, 2005

The Department of Energy estimates the impact of energy-efficient technologies based on a national modeling system. To improve results, the system should take into account regional differences in the price-demand relationship for electricity and natural gas.

Regional Differences in the Price-Elasticity of Demand For Energy

By: Mark A. Bernstein, James Griffin
Cover Image
The Department of Energy has a series of programs intended to spur development and adoption of energy-efficient technologies. This report examines how trends in the energy market may vary at the state and regional levels, and how price-elasticity of demand (a measure of how demand responds to price), varies at the national, regional, state, and utility levels. To determine if regional, state, or sub-state characteristics could affect the size of the impact of energy-efficient technologies on energy prices, supply, and consumption, it is necessary to examine how individual factors-such as climate, supply constraints, energy costs, and demand for natural gas-might affect the extent of this impact. Three energy-demand components are addressed in this report: electricity use in the residential sector, natural gas use in the residential sector, and electricity use in the commercial sector. The goal of this research is to determine whether state- and regional-level differences were significant enough to recommend to the Department of Energy the disaggregation of data by state or region when estimating the potential benefits of
energy-efficient technologies.


RAND

Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy
Edited by: John Arquilla, David Ronfeldt Pages: 380 ISBN: 0-8330-3030-2
Netwar-like cyberwar-describes a new spectrum of conflict that is emerging in the wake of the information revolution. Netwar includes conflicts waged, on the one hand, by terrorists, criminals, gangs, and ethnic extremists; and by civil-society activists (such as cyber activists or WTO protestors) on the other. What distinguishes netwar is the networked organizational structure of its practitioners-with many groups actually being leaderless-and their quickness in coming together in swarming attacks. To confront this new type of conflict, it is crucial for governments, military, and law enforcement to begin networking themselves.

SOX-404

Tax Risk: Nobody Said It Would Be Easy
In today’s market, tax directors and CFOs have to react to increased internal and external scrutiny – bringing about greater awareness of the need for tax risk management. This includes the overall management of the tax department as well as implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards, FAS 109, new internal control management and reporting standards such as SOX-404 and greater uncertainty over tax positions taken in the past. Ernst & Young is the market and thought leader in this area. Learn more below.

Ten Tips for Improved Tax Risk Management
Leading-practice companies are focusing on improving tax risk management quality, increasing efficiency, enhancing capabilities and redefining the role of the tax function. We outline ten leading practices that every tax department should consider. Download the publication, Sarbanes-Oxley and Tax .(pdf, 45kb)

Tax Risk Management
With credibility issues at the forefront, and a heightened focus on corporate governance, the challenges facing today’s Tax Director have expanded. Tax risk management is a top priority, according to this global study by Ernst & Young, Tax risk management: The evolving role of tax directors. Read more. (pdf, 1mb)

Webcast: Tax Risk Management
Legislative and regulatory changes around the world have made tax risk planning an urgent and top priority. This webcast discusses why tax risk management is becoming essential to protecting corporate reputation. View the webcast.

Tax Resources under Pressure
European tax directors expect their compliance and regulatory burdens to increase; they’re also concerned about the continuing cost of compliance and exposure to emerging tax regimes. Find out more in Ernst & Young’s 2005 survey of 150 European tax and finance executives, Resources Under Pressure. Read more. (pdf, 569kb)

Regulatory compliance takes the lead

Regulatory compliance takes the lead as the most important driver of information security, surpassing worms and viruses
Yet organizations are missing the rare investment opportunities that compliance offers to promote information security as an integral part of their business says Ernst & Young’s 8th annual Global Information Security Survey (pdf, 320kb)

London and New York – 2 November 2005 – Compliance with regulations has taken the lead as the primary driver of information security, for the first time surpassing worms and viruses, according to a survey released today by leading professional services provider Ernst & Young.

The sheer number of regulations and the consequences of not complying with them has escalated information security to the boardroom. Nearly two-thirds of survey respondents – representing 1,300 global companies, government and non-profit agencies in 55 nations – cited compliance with regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley, the EU’s 8th Directive or their equivalent as the primary driver of information security.

However, organizations are missing the rare investment opportunities that compliance offers to promote information security as an integral part of their business. “Compliance is proving to be more of a distraction than a catalyst for information security becoming strategically aligned within organizations,” Edwin Bennett, Global Director of Ernst & Young’s Technology and Security Risk Services, said. “One might assume that with the attention information security is receiving due to regulatory compliance, organizations’ information security postures are improving and information security as a function is becoming more integral to their strategic initiatives. Unfortunately, this is not happening on a consistent basis. The gap continues to widen between the growing risks brought on by rapid changes in the global business environment and what information security is doing to address those risks. This pattern is consistent across organizations, regardless of size or location.”


Business demands pushing the adoption of emerging technologies

The Ernst & Young survey found that business demands and the declining cost of wireless connectivity are driving the rapid widespread adoption of mobile technology. But with these devices leaving the safety of the corporate control environment, the information assets and intellectual property they carry are increasingly becoming the responsibility of individuals to protect—a responsibility that many organizations have not yet fully accepted nor anticipated. “Less than half of organizations make provision for general users of information to be trained or made aware of the impact of information security issues with these technologies, and fewer still receive training on responding to security incidents,” Bennett noted.

Other rapidly developing technologies such as voice-over IP telephony, open source, and server virtualization, which hold the potential of increasing organizations’ competitive advantage are reported to be a significant security concern among fewer than 20% of organizations, despite the serious threats they bring with them. Organizations consider emerging technologies in general to be a growing security concern in the next 12 months. However, over a quarter of them have no plans to take action to address the concern during that time period or beyond.

Third party risk remains an issue

Outsourcing remains an information security threat as many organizations are still not paying adequate attention to vendor risk management—the process of assessing and mitigating risks, including due diligence and regular reviews of practices and procedures supporting vendors’ products and services. The survey reveals that one-fifth of respondents do not address the issue of vendor risk management at all, and one-third report they have only informal procedures in place to do so.

“It is no longer enough for organizations to consider just their own information security issues and threats,” Bennett said. “As the world becomes increasingly smaller, and with more and more information flowing between companies, all organizations need to consider the security of their business partners, outsourcing arrangements, suppliers and customers. Otherwise, the value created by these arrangements can quickly diminish or disappear due to perceived or real security, privacy, or identity breaches. Organizations should also consider demonstrating their own commitment to good information security by applying recognized standards or becoming certified, “

Organizational alignment and execution

Although awareness about information security has risen as a critical issue among boards and executive management, they continue to focus information security activities on operational and tactical issues at the expense of addressing strategic concerns.

“With proper organizational alignment and execution, information security can make significant contributions to the organization’s strategic initiatives and overall risk management,” Bennett noted. “Organizations which employ information security in this way continuously involve business, IT, and information security leaders in identifying specific areas where information security can contribute to strategic initiatives, such as mergers and acquisitions and outsourcing of business operations. They apply recognized information security standards, leading practices and the appropriate resources.”

Security Articles Index

Ernst&Young
EY Digital Security Index Shows Fortune 500 Companies Lack 'Best in Class' Digital Security Programs
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt No Longer Enough to Secure Adequate Funding for Information Security
Regulatory compliance takes the lead as the most important driver of information security, surpassing worms and viruses
CEOs Aware, but Not Acting on Threats to Information Security (UK, 23 September 2004)

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
2005 Global Security Survey (1131 KB) Published 22-June-2005; 44 pages 日本語版


RAND
National Security Research Division
Privacy, Security, and Electronic Surveillance

Maryland

ITU

ITU WSIS Thematic Meeting on Cybersecurity
The WSIS Thematic Meeting on Cybersecurity took place 28 June ? 1 July 2005 at ITU headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. This conference examined the recommendations in the World Summit on the Information Society first phase's

GIT

Homeland Security
National Critical Infrastructure Protection Research and Development Plan (PDF, 96 pages -- 2 MB)
The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace

NSA
CIA

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act - DMCA

シリコンバレーで4年ぶりに雇用が拡大

シリコンバレーで4年ぶりに雇用が純増した。これは、米国のハイテク首都であるシリコンバレーが、長びく不況の峠を越えたことを示す兆である。カリフォルニア州サンフランシスコおよびサンノゼ地域の企業および公共機関を代表する非営利団体Joint Venture Silicon Valleyが年次報告で伝えた。

この報告は、同地域が取得した特許件数や、ベンチャーキャピタル投資額、教育的な要因などのさまざまなデータをカバーしている。報告によると、雇用のほかにも明るい様相がある。シリコンバレーには、ますます、高度なクリエイティブ・デザインや技術職の雇用が集中するようになり、このような職種の雇用が同地域の雇用全体の14%を占めるようになった。これは、同雇用が米国の雇用全体の2%を占めているのに比べれば格段に高い。ただし、雇用は拡大し始めたばかりだ。同報告によると、2004年から2005年にかけてシリコンバレーの雇用は2000人の純微増だった。 同地域は、従業員ひとりあたりの平均給与、ベンチャーキャピタル投資額などの数点で、2000年の最高水準を大幅に下回っている。それでも10年ごとに見れば、シリコンバレーは現在、1995年に比べて
多くの点で強くなっている。

(同報告の共同著者らによると)このデータは、「シリコンバレーの新しい顔」を示している。つまり、シリコンバレーが、これまでの技術志向の経済からアイデア志向の経済へと移行しているということだ。アイデア志向の経済では、Apple Computerの携帯デジタル音楽プレイヤiPodに見られるような、「経験」を伝える技術を生み出す非常にクリエイティブな人間が要求される。AppleやGoolge Inc.などは、この新しい「アイデア経済」の典型だ。

事実、このような企業の一部は、昨年のシリコンバレーの雇用と富の拡大に大きく貢献した。例えば、Googleは従業員を2004年末の3021人から65%増やし、2005年9月に4989人にした。

<出典>THE WALL STREET JOURNAL 2006年1月17日

取締役の義務

 会社と取締役の関係は委任契約。取締役は、善良なる管理者の注意をもって会社を経営する義務(善管注意義務)がある。また、法令、定款、総会決議を守り会社のために忠実に職務を遂行する義務(忠実義務)がある。取締役は違法配当、株主に対する利益供与、競合取引、談合、贈収賄等商法第266条に規定する行為をなした場合責任追及されるが、善管注意義務、忠実義務違反を理由に責任追及されることがある。

(1)取引先の経営状態が悪化したにも関わらずなされた融通手形の発行、商品売却等の法律行為
(2)放漫経営(顧客満足・社員満足を向上する努力をせず業績も悪化)
(3)監視義務違反(他の取締役の違法行為を是正しようともせずに放置(不作為)すること)

違法行為はもちろんのこと、善菅義務違反などがあれば、取締役は株主(代表訴訟)や第三者による損害賠償責任を個人的に追求されることがある。経営判断の法理による反論やD&O保険(米国)による対策もあるが、基本は経営のプロフェッショナルとしての「義務履行」である。

(1)法令順守義務を念頭において行動
収益至上主義を是正しコンプライアンス体制の構築を心がける。内部告発を尊重し会社の問題点を検証するのが時代の要請と考えるべきである。

(2)取締役会において異議を述べ異議を述べた旨を議事録に記載するよう要請
商法第266条に規定する事項については、事実上異議を述べるだけでは足りず議事録に異議を述べた旨の記載がないと決議に賛成したものとみなされ、責任を負担することになる。

(3)他の取締役が放漫経営などの不相当な行為をした場合、取締役会を開催するなどをしてこれを是正
他の取締役の不相当な行為については、仲間であるからとか上司であるからとかの理由で迎合することなく、会社は誰のためにあるのかということを念頭において是正の努力をすべきである。